Trump’s Tariffs: A Beautiful Word for a Terrible Idea

It is a truth universally acknowledged, though rarely admitted in polite company, that Donald Trump’s economic ideas have the intellectual rigor of a soggy cocktail napkin. Yet here we are, in 2025, once again grappling with his devotion to tariffs—or as he might call them, the Mona Lisa of economic policy. Tariffs, that ancient tool of mercantilist folly, are now poised to drag the world economy backward, one ham-fisted policy at a time.

To understand the folly of Trump’s tariff obsession, one must first confront his bizarre infatuation with the trade deficit. To Trump, it is not merely an accounting figure but a moral affront, a scorecard of national virility. This fixation ignores the fundamental nature of modern economics, where trade balances are shaped by factors far beyond tariffs—savings rates, investment flows, and the occasional global pandemic. The idea that slapping tariffs on imports will magically fix this “deficit” is akin to bailing out a sinking ship with a thimble while ignoring the gaping hole in the hull.

Even in his first term, Trump’s tariffs did little to narrow America’s trade deficit. Instead, they triggered a predictable chain reaction: higher costs for American consumers, retaliatory measures from trading partners, and a stronger dollar that made U.S. exports less competitive. It was a masterclass in economic self-sabotage, dressed up as a patriotic crusade. Yet Trump, with the tenacity of a man who insists his steak must be well-done, has doubled down on his belief that tariffs are the economic equivalent of magic beans.

The most pernicious aspect of tariffs, however, is their impact on manufacturing. Trump’s vision of a “manufacturing renaissance” is a sepia-toned fantasy that ignores the complexities of modern production. In his imagination, factories will rise like phoenixes from the rust belts of America, their assembly lines humming with the patriotic fervor of yesteryear. The reality, as always, is more prosaic. Manufacturing jobs are not returning en masse because tariffs make inputs—like steel and aluminum—more expensive, driving up costs for downstream industries and undermining competitiveness. Protecting one struggling sector by kneecapping its more successful counterparts is not an economic strategy; it is industrial cannibalism.

And then there’s Trump’s most fever-dream-esque proposition: replacing income tax with tariffs. To the uninformed, this may sound like a populist masterstroke—make foreigners pay for the government! But even the most cursory glance at the numbers reveals the absurdity of this plan. A universal tariff would raise prices for American consumers, disproportionately burdening the working class while generating a pittance compared to income tax revenues. The “External Revenue Service,” as Trump has dubbed it, would be less an innovation and more a farcical rebranding of economic illiteracy.

Perhaps the most dangerous aspect of Trump’s tariff fixation is its potential to ignite global retaliation. Tariffs are not mere taxes; they are weapons, and their deployment invites counterattacks. The global economy, already fragile from years of pandemic disruptions and geopolitical tensions, cannot afford a trade war. Yet Trump’s approach to tariffs—scattershot, impulsive, and deeply personal—risks plunging the world into precisely that scenario. Will tariffs punish China for TikTok? Fentanyl precursors? The wrong shade of red on a flag? Who knows? The logic is as opaque as it is arbitrary.

Trump’s nostalgic lionization of 19th-century economic policies is perhaps the final insult. High tariffs and rapid growth did indeed coexist in that era, but the connection was incidental, not causal. America’s expansion was fueled by demographic growth, industrial innovation, and the exploitation of resources, not by sheltering inefficient industries behind tariff walls. To suggest otherwise is to rewrite history with the finesse of a reality TV producer—entertaining, perhaps, but devoid of substance.

In the end, Trump’s tariffs are not an economic strategy but a political gambit—a shiny bauble designed to distract and inflame. They offer the illusion of action while achieving nothing of substance, a sleight of hand that harms American workers, alienates allies, and undermines global stability. As Franklin Roosevelt warned nearly a century ago, tariffs are the road to ruin. That we are even considering traveling down this road again is a testament to the enduring power of bad ideas, especially when marketed with a catchy slogan and a dollop of bluster.

The tragedy of Trump’s tariffs is not just their economic cost but their squandered opportunity. America’s true strengths lie not in protectionism but in innovation, openness, and the dynamism of its people. To cling to tariffs is to ignore these strengths, to trade the promise of progress for the hollow allure of nostalgia. It is a choice unworthy of a great nation—and one that history will not judge kindly.

MOre writing

The Augmented Brain: How Search Engines Are Changing the Way We Think

By 2025, search engines and recommendation systems have moved beyond mere tools for retrieving information—they’ve become extensions of human cognition, functioning as externalized brains. Powered by advances in indexing, vector databases, and cross-referencing technologies, these systems reshape how we process knowledge. But as they grow indispensable, we must confront a critical question: Are they enhancing our thinking, or are we outsourcing it entirely?

The Rise of Palantir: The Watcher on the Wall

In 1587, Queen Elizabeth I’s spymaster, Francis Walsingham, achieved one of the great coups in the history of espionage. Using little more than intercepted letters, ciphers, and the occasional tortured confession, Walsingham exposed the Babington Plot, a conspiracy to assassinate Elizabeth and place Mary, Queen of Scots, on the throne. Walsingham's reward? Eternal gratitude from the queen, the continued survival of Protestant England—and, one imagines, the sort of satisfaction that only comes from outwitting murderous aristocrats. His tools were crude, but his mission was clear: decode the enemy before they destroy you.

A Republic of Clowns: Trump, Biden, and the Two-Party Pantomime

It is the tragicomic fate of the American republic that it continues to lurch from the doddering to the demagogic, from the vacuously polite to the vulgarian grotesque, as though it were trapped in a slapstick routine without a punchline. Were this not the world’s most powerful nation, it might simply elicit pity. Instead, it commands a mix of horror and schadenfreude from those outside its borders and outright despair from those within.

Principles of the self

  1. Integrity is priceless, even when expensive. Betrayal—of others or yourself—costs far more.
  2. Form opinions and test them against the sharpest counterpoints. Survive the crucible or abandon your stance.
  3. Do not seek approval; seek conviction. Plant your flag and march.
  4. Memorize words that move you. They will rescue you in silence and inspire in noise.
  5. Be specific. Precision slices through confusion.
  6. Separate creator from editor. First, let your thoughts pour out raw. Then, refine them into brilliance.
  7. Nostalgia will inevitably gild the present. Savor the now while you inhabit it.
  8. Don’t “network”—befriend. Sincerity builds bridges ambition cannot.
  9. The most valuable insights often reside in the obscure. Seek the unorthodox and the antique.
  10. Seek people who energize you. Cling to them; they are rare and vital.
  11. Aim absurdly high. Mediocrity is gravity; ambition, the force that defies it.
  12. To cram vitality into years, cram effort into days. Make every moment count. As my wife once said, you can’t half ass your life.

The Tyranny of Symbolism: Kamala Harris, Identity Politics, and the Death of Substance

History, that tireless collector of humanity’s worst decisions, is littered with tales of leaders who rose to power not by the weight of their ideas but by the clever branding of their banners—often as empty as the heads waving them. The fall of Mrs Harris as a political force, and her Democratic Party’s fixation on identity politics, is yet another grim chapter in this story—a warning about the perils of elevating symbolism over substance.

Driving Back to the Future: The Humane Elegance of Rivian’s R3

Amidst a parade of electric vehicles that resemble sullen rectangles and expressionless bars of soap, Rivian's R3 emerges as a pleasant anomaly—proof that design doesn't have to surrender to the soulless tyranny of efficiency. It doesn’t look like it was drawn by an algorithm on a tight deadline, nor does it aspire to double as a Blade Runner prop. Instead, it dares to be approachable, elegant, and, most shockingly of all, human. The R3 suggests that the electric future need not sacrifice warmth and charm at the altar of technological inevitability.

The Algorithm Ate My Muse

There was a time, not so distant, when the artist’s labor was a rebellion against oblivion—a furious demand to be seen, heard, or understood across the gulfs of time. Caravaggio’s chiaroscuro wrestled with mortality itself; James Joyce redefined the limits of language as though daring humanity to keep up. Today, that struggle has been outsourced to a cold and unfeeling steward: the Algorithm, a faceless arbiter whose only metric is engagement, a deity whose offerings are served with a side of irrelevance.

Bread, Circuses, and Career Changes: The Roman Recipe for a Full Life

In the austere marble visions of ancient Rome, a full life was conceived as a mosaic of many parts, each tessera contributing its own brilliance to the greater whole. The ideal citizen of the Republic was expected to begin as a soldier, honing body and spirit on the battlefield. This was no mere martial posturing; it was a rite of passage, a crucible through which courage and discipline were forged. The next phase called for the role of merchant or entrepreneur, extracting profit from the unruly seas of commerce and learning the art of negotiation and resourcefulness. Finally, when wisdom had been chiseled by the hand of experience, the citizen would ascend to politics—a domain for the wrinkled and worldly, where philosophical musings and rhetorical flourishes danced uneasily with power plays and poison-tipped daggers. This triptych of soldier, merchant, and statesman was no accidental sequence; it was a deliberate strategy, a life philosophy that embraced the full spectrum of human potential.

Vladimir Putin: The Emperor Has No Judo Moves

If history has taught us anything, it’s that autocrats come in two flavors: the tyrannical genius and the petty despot. Vladimir Putin—a man whose cult of personality hinges on shirtless photo ops and a permanent sneer—is firmly in the latter camp. A Machiavellian mastermind? Hardly. This is a man whose greatest achievements include turning Russia into an economic afterthought and staging the geopolitical equivalent of a high school drama club production.

Crafting Silence: How Architecture Can Heal a Chaotic World

In a world saturated with noise—literal, visual, and ideological—it is increasingly rare to encounter spaces that insist upon silence. Yet this is precisely what the work of Tadao Ando accomplishes: an audacious refusal to capitulate to the clamor of modernity. Ando’s structures, which temper the severity of concrete with the capriciousness of light, are not mere buildings but sanctuaries for the mind and soul. They embody a principle that has been all but forgotten in contemporary architecture: the power of restraint.

The Silent Authority of Premium Typography in Website Design

In 1916, Edward Johnston designed the typeface for the London Underground, a system as labyrinthine as it was revolutionary. Johnston’s task was not merely to create legible signage but to craft a typographic identity that would unify a sprawling and disjointed network. The result, his eponymous typeface, was a study in disciplined elegance: humanist proportions, clean geometry, and an innate sense of balance. It didn’t just guide commuters; it gave the city’s chaotic modernity a sense of order and calm. Johnston understood that type wasn’t a passive component of design but an active force, shaping perception and experience at the most visceral level.

Marcel Proust: The King of the Cork-Lined Cocoon

To understand Marcel Proust is to accept the absurd and improbable fact that one of the greatest literary achievements in human history emerged not from a life of action, but from one of inaction—a life largely spent in bed. And not just any bed, mind you, but a fortress of hypersensitivity, meticulously arranged to shield its inhabitant from the twin horrors of modernity: noise and drafts.

On J.E. Gordon’s Structures: Or Why Things Don’t Fall Down

There’s something delightful about a book that takes a subject as unsexy as “why stuff doesn’t fall over” and manages to make it both fascinating and, dare I say, funny. J.E. Gordon’s Structures: Or Why Things Don’t Fall Down is that rare sort of book—one that sneaks into your brain disguised as entertainment but leaves you a bit smarter, slightly smugger, and much more suspicious of bridges.

The Man in the Photograph

On my office shelf, a photograph of my father stands watch—silent, unchanging, and, in a way, unknowable. In it, he carries wood planks over his shoulder, his grin a fragment of unselfconscious joy. Behind him, the ski chalet he restored stands like a monument to competence and optimism. It’s the sort of picture that captures a person not as they were in their totality but as they might wish to be remembered—a distillation, free of the messier truths of illness, fatigue, or the gradual erosion of character that time so often imposes.